Use case

Policy Review

Policy owners need to compare versions, isolate obligations, and show review evidence without turning every question into a manual research project.

Example source set

current policy PDFsprior versionsprocedure docsexception logsreview notes

Five questions the workspace can answer

What changed between the old and new policy?
Which sections require manager approval?
Where are exceptions documented?
Which teams are named in the procedure?
What should be reviewed before publishing this update?

Evidence-answer example format

Question: What changed between the old and new policy?

Short answer: 2-4 plain-English sentences with confidence and caveats.

Evidence: source name, page/section, excerpt, and why it matters.

Next action: approve, export, request missing source, or escalate for human review.

Approval and export workflow

  1. 1. Load current and prior policy sources
  2. 2. Compare key sections
  3. 3. Flag missing approvals
  4. 4. Create review export
  5. 5. Route final decision to the owner

Must-not-do boundaries

Do not claim regulatory compliance certification
Do not make final legal determinations
Do not approve changes without named owner review

Recommended offer

Ops Evidence System: $1,500/mo plus setup

Ops Evidence System at $1,500/mo plus setup for recurring review and approval workflows.

FAQ

Does this replace legal review?

No. It prepares source-backed review packets so human reviewers can work faster.

Can exports show what changed?

Yes. Exports can include cited differences, open questions, and approval status.

Is this a free pilot?

No. The first public step is a paid 25-document evidence demo. The $500 demo is credited to setup when you continue into a workspace plan.

Can the workspace answer without sources?

No. The system is designed for source-backed answers. If the right document is missing, the next step is to upload or request the missing source.

Does the system make final legal, credit, insurance, or employment decisions?

No. The workspace organizes evidence and routes review. Human reviewers keep approval authority for consequential decisions.