Use case

Internal Document Search

Teams waste hours searching handbooks, SOPs, tickets, decks, and shared drives, then still cannot prove where an answer came from.

Example source set

SOP foldersteam handbooksonboarding docssupport ticketsproject notes

Five questions the workspace can answer

What is the current process for approving a vendor exception?
Which onboarding steps changed since last quarter?
Where does the team define escalation ownership?
What evidence supports this customer-facing policy answer?
Which docs disagree about the same operating rule?

Evidence-answer example format

Question: What is the current process for approving a vendor exception?

Short answer: 2-4 plain-English sentences with confidence and caveats.

Evidence: source name, page/section, excerpt, and why it matters.

Next action: approve, export, request missing source, or escalate for human review.

Approval and export workflow

  1. 1. Upload the operating packet
  2. 2. Ask the first five live questions
  3. 3. Review cited passages
  4. 4. Approve an answer
  5. 5. Export the evidence note

Must-not-do boundaries

Do not invent policy when the source is missing
Do not bypass owner approval
Do not merge conflicting docs without review

Recommended offer

Evidence Workspace: $500/mo

Evidence Workspace at $500/mo after the credited demo.

FAQ

Can it search across shared-drive chaos?

Yes, after selected files are uploaded or connected into a scoped workspace.

Can reviewers see the citation trail?

Yes. Answers are formatted with source, section, excerpt, confidence, and next action.

Is this a free pilot?

No. The first public step is a paid 25-document evidence demo. The $500 demo is credited to setup when you continue into a workspace plan.

Can the workspace answer without sources?

No. The system is designed for source-backed answers. If the right document is missing, the next step is to upload or request the missing source.

Does the system make final legal, credit, insurance, or employment decisions?

No. The workspace organizes evidence and routes review. Human reviewers keep approval authority for consequential decisions.