FTS

FTS Evidence Workspace

Fat Tailed Solutions

Use case

IP Evidence Workspace

IP teams need to keep claims, references, invention records, office-action notes, and reviewer decisions tied to source evidence.

Example source set

invention disclosuresclaim chartsprior art referencesoffice actionsreview memoslab notes

Five questions the workspace can answer

Which references discuss this claim element?
Where does the disclosure support this feature?
What evidence is missing before counsel review?
Which office-action arguments cite this concept?
What should be exported for a review packet?

Evidence-answer example format

Question: Which references discuss this claim element?

Short answer: 2-4 plain-English sentences with confidence and caveats.

Evidence: source name, page/section, excerpt, and why it matters.

Next action: approve, export, request missing source, or escalate for human review.

Approval and export workflow

  1. 1. Load the IP packet
  2. 2. Map claims to evidence
  3. 3. Mark gaps
  4. 4. Route counsel or reviewer approval
  5. 5. Export source-backed packet notes

Must-not-do boundaries

Do not replace attorney judgment
Do not make patentability conclusions
Do not cite sources that were not uploaded or connected

Recommended offer

Custom Data System: From $5,000/mo plus setup

Custom Data System from $5,000/mo plus setup for specialized IP workflows and integrations.

Try a 25-document evidence demoBook a private data map

FAQ

Is this a legal opinion tool?

No. It organizes evidence and review packets for qualified human decision-makers.

Can the source map be customized?

Yes. Custom systems can model claim elements, references, decisions, and exports.

Is this a free pilot?

No. The first public step is a paid 25-document evidence demo. The $500 demo is credited to setup when you continue into a workspace plan.

Can the workspace answer without sources?

No. The system is designed for source-backed answers. If the right document is missing, the next step is to upload or request the missing source.

Does the system make final legal, credit, insurance, or employment decisions?

No. The workspace organizes evidence and routes review. Human reviewers keep approval authority for consequential decisions.